If the answer to any of the following questions is true, the tool below might be for you.
1. Have you ever wondered if trade shows are more of a drain on your organization than a benefit?
2. Do you start to sweat when the business leaders in your organization begin asking about the return on trade shows you attend?
3. Are you routinely asked to attend trade shows that you do not believe will add value?
4. Do you have people in your organization that are emotionally charged about attending a show?
Deciding which trade shows to attend can be a difficult decision when emotions enter the decision process. It seems that every show has a strong advocate trying to convince the organization to attend.
Statements such as, “all our customers will be there”, “the market will think we have disappeared if we don’t attend”, “the trade publications won’t think we are a serious player”, and “this is the largest show in our biggest market segment” are a reflection of feeling, not fact.
Conversely, with very tight budgets and demand to show ROI, deciding which show to attend can prove to be just as difficult.
While establishing better goals and metrics is a usual course of action to prove marketing return, trade shows can be particularly challenging.
To ensure the show success it is important to set up quantitative and qualitative metrics prior to deciding to exhibit. If you establish goals such as the number leads, number of customer meetings, and the number of brand impressions you can mitigate emotional decision making.
Driving to Trade Show ROI
To measure ROI it is important to fully capture the costs and benefits of a show. Below I propose some metrics that can be used to demonstrate the benefit of a show. Three metrics in particular are the calculation of Advertising Equivalence, cost savings from customer meetings, and monetizing brand impressions with speaking engagements.
I would recommend the development of a standard template that includes the elements listed below. It is also important to consider the timing of when you validate the results. I have found that it is important to check at least three times: Immediately, within a month or so and then again when deciding to attend the show again.
Trade Show Costs
Event Sponsorships/Exhibition
- Exhibit costs
- Speaker costs
- Sponsorships
- Individual registrations
- Other
Transportation
- Booth / Equipment Shipping costs
- Other Transportation
Travel
- Number of attendees x the average cost per day x the number of days
Promotional gifts/collateral
- Promotional gifts
- Printer materials
- Other promotional items (pre-show mailers, etc.)
- Graphics /Banners / Signs
Resource Costs (Time x salary)
- Attendees
- Creative services costs (agency, writers, designers, etc.)
- Show planner
- Marketing manager
- Product manager
- Other
Customer Meetings
- Meeting room
- Food and beverage
- Marketing materials
- Other
Show Benefits (Included both quantitative and qualitative measures):
Leads
- Number of leads
- Total revenue resulting from closed leads
- Increased Brand Awareness and Reputation
- Estimate impressions (total attendees at show that see sponsorship of a general session)
- Booth traffic impressions (Track for a period of time and then extrapolate)
- Brand survey results (taken at the booth)
Public Relations
- Press Release Coverage (Number picked up by trade publications)
- Speaking engagements (Number and survey results showing interest)
- Ad Equivalency (Cost for a full page advertisement / the amount of coverage space in an article)
- Press meetings/ new relationships developed
Customer Relationship Development and Savings
- Number of customer meetings
- Savings from travel to individual customers (number of meetings x number of staff x travel costs – total cost of travel to individual meetings)
Market Research Insight
- Number of research surveys completed
- Document and key learning from customers at the show
- Competitive information gathered
When using criteria such as the above, you should be able to add the total costs and the total benefits and ultimately be able to calculate the shows ROI (benefits-expenses/expense).
Hopefully, this provides some additional insight into the measurement of trade shows.
Do you see anything that is missing from this list?
Tags: market research, public relations, trade show, trade show ROI







You can really maximize your ROI by choosing industry specific promotional products. Attendees will always remember a company who offers a unique gift over those who offer no gift or a very typical one.
Great article. I recently started blogging and I’m glad that I found your site.
I definitely have a love/hate relationship with tradeshows and have always felt that analyzing the post-show ROI is an almost impossible task.
Let’s face it, trade shows are ridiculously expensive. From I&D to lead retrieval to union labor to drayage to oversize printing, the markups in this industry are outrageous, but we continue to participate because these shows are the foremost opportunity to gauge the state of the industry.
Although the hard line ROIs for tradeshows are hard to determine, you can’t dismiss the non-monetary opportunities that they provide. This includes opportunities to observe trends, obtain honest customer feedback, network with synergistic partners and keep your ears open at all times (especially true if you share a lunch table with strangers.)
Now if we could just do something about the cost of drayage…
Gail Levy
www.tabletkiosk.blogspot.com
I agree that promotional items can be very effective in accomplishing tradeshow goals. For example, using a pre-show mailing to indicate that the keynote speaker will be signing books at your booth during a certain time can certainly lead to more booth traffic. Alternatively, providing simple daily needs can be just as effective. Offering premium coffee, assuming the show decorator will allow it, can also be effective.
I certainly agree that there are qualitative benefits to be gained when attending shows. I guess the question to ask first is could you simply attend the show, instead of exhibiting and receive the same benefit without all the cost. I would argue that you could even learn more, without an exhibit, as there would be less distraction from exhibit hours, I&D, etc.
Having said that, I agree that tradeshows are an important marketing tactic to be used when appropriate and measured carefully to ensure you are optimizing the experience.
I believe it is important to establish specific goals, even those goals are qualitative, and the measure those goals to ensure success.
Oh, BTW - I could agree more about the Drayage costs…
Perhaps we can start some dialog about the best ways people have found to avoid them.
What a fantastic article to make people think about the benefits of exhibiting. I do agree that promotional items can lend a hand in the success - I have seen when a client properly markets their promotional items by way of pre-show marketing it really helps benefit booth traffic. There are several marketing tips that I have seen that work well for
Promotional Items & Marketing
The rising costs of drayage would be a great topic of discussion, it is tough for the smaller companies that want to begin marketing via trade shows to actually get over the hurdle of the exhibiting costs, let alone the cost of drayage.
Tom-
Another benefit is business development. Large trade shows that everyone (truly) attends are great opportunities to meet with partners. This can be more cost effective than taking several separate trips.
I will probably get beat up for saying this, but I personally do not see the value of tradeshow giveaways. Yes they are great for pulling in booth traffic, but are they pulling in potential customers or attendees looking for swag to take back home to the kids. There are tons of people who attend tradeshows looking for free goodies who could care less about the products you showing.
The exception to this is to have a targeted giveaway that you provide to those you can identify as real potential leads.
At the end of the day, the number of qualified leads you get is worth a lot a heck of a lot more than booth traffic you attracted because of a free giveaway.
Gail Levy
www.tabletkiosk.blogspot.com
Great overview. But I didn’t see two items:
1. Training salespeople how to sell and qualify prospects at the show (Hill Group).
2. The types of lead acquisition system to use at the show to gain the most qualified leads.
The Sales Lead Management Association has articles on its site about trade show training. One of its advertisers is NewLeads the lead acquisition company.
With proper training salespeople can quadruple the number of qualified leads. With a superior inquiry acquisition system you can get amazing information about the people who inquire. This article should also be on the SLMA web site.
[…] 11, 2008 Tom Reynor su Lonely Marketer “Are Trade Shows a Waste of Time and […]
I agree with Gail. Having a great booth giveaway can draw a lot of traffic, but is it the right traffic? No wonder Sales only follows up on 10% of trade show leads (SiriusDecisions). They know that a lot of the names that come back from a show are just the guy who wanted the cool giveaway and have no interest in your product.
A better tactic would be to attend a targeted trade show where you know the attending companies are the right fit. Then you have a starting point from which to find the right decision maker in those companies. We are talking a lot about this at www.theb2blead.com, if you want to check us out sometime.
Trade shows - a big subject and one that I am struggling with at the moment. I have had a number of new projects recently with clients that used them none of whom could justify them in terms of directly attributable sales.
By using a monitoring stystenm like those that I build into my sales process management tool Ascent I can see potential if execution were improved in some areas, but its still borderline.
Targeted shows only mean that visitors are a rough fit, but rarely can you be sure they influence on purchasing to the extent that you need. The give-aways is a red herring as has been pointed out - you get increased visits, but no change in sales - but generally the numbers just don’t work.
If your KPIs are PR and feelgood factor - although this is hard to measure - you might get closer to making a case, but the trouble with that route is that you have to have a stand with real “Wow!” factor and that just pushes up the investment. There is often a better ROI from other initiatives.
If you are a new business looking for exposure or a mailing list, there could be a case for trade shows as a part of an integrated campaign, but, again you have to make a splash and few small businesses have deep enough pockets.
There’s also a big difference between BtoB and public trade shows and what you can do with each of them.
In my experience, trade shows can be a huge waste of money, but they can also provide serious benefits, if approached strategically.
Spending tons of money on flashy booths and giveaways is for the giants…a smaller company may get huge benefits building relationships with potential partners (business development, as mentioned above), walking the floor and spreading the word about recent success stories, handing out business cards….This old-fashioned word of mouth marketing can pay off big dividends for small- and medium-sized firms at trade shows…without breaking the bank!
Every tool to promote your products and grow your brand is a great tool if you can afford it . Id you can’t is not. I think is that simple.
Every tool to promote your products and grow your brand is a great tool if you can afford it . If you can’t,then is not. I think is that simple.
I think John’s comment comes close to the right approach for a small organisation - don’t take a stand, walk the aisles. But it doesn’t change my view that its all about the “big idea”. It doesn’t have to be large scale or particularly expensive to execute, but unfortunately small businesses rarely combine the idea generation and the standard of execution required to make it wow!
Having worked in marketing for many a start-up, I have had to come up with my share of “big ideas” to drive booth traffic without breaking the bank. The latest was a booth theme of Let’s Make a Deal, you know that game show from the 70’s where contestants dressed in costume. We definitely drew a crowd with Fred and Wilma Flintstone walking the show floor. For a good laugh, you can see pictures here: http://www.theb2blead.com/b2b-marketing-ideas/marketing-wtf-playing-dress-up-is-not-just-for-halloween/
The biggest issue here in Europe are unmotivated or badly trained sales staff.
Invest in it, special training, procedures and so on. Then, almost any trade show becomes interesting.
Also here in Europe, a trade show is more and more seen as an informal contact moment with existing clients.
Best regards,
GL
The Netherlands
http://www.lening-geld-lenen.nl/
[…] As a marketer with limited resources, I am always tweaking my programs and trimming the fat or trashing completely anything that isn’t helping to generate revenue. For a small company, impressions and brand awareness mean basically nothing to me. My job is lead gen, period. For me, events and trade shows have been one of those areas where I do get some good leads but the ROI often does not justify the expense. One of my favorite blogs, The Lonely Marketer, was discussing this topic in the post Are Trade Shows a Waste of Time and Resources. […]
I’ve had this article bookmarked for awhile, as I contemplated your points. In my previous life, I used to provide counsel on conferences from a PR perspective. You raise some good points; however, I disagree with this point -
“Ad Equivalency (Cost for a full page advertisement / the amount of coverage space in an article).”
I’m not a big fan of this as there are too many ways to calculate this. And sometimes, a smaller article will drive more traffic to your website than a well-known pub, hence skewing the actual value of that coverage.
Beyond PR, I do believe that tradeshows play important role in one’s marketing mix. From my company’s perspective, we see more organizers adding online components, such as webcasting keynotes/panels live, recording sessions and making them available for download post-show, virtual tradeshow, and more. (Note: my company does webcasting).
For those unable to bring a larger team or attend due to other conflicts, online availability raises another set of criteria to consider: Reduction of travel, lodging, food and staffing costs; Number and quality of leads at the show and via online; Amount of closed business from face-to-face online leads; and more.
I’m curious to know what you think.
Best,
Cece
http://www.ON24.com
I completely agree that using Ad Equivalence is a very subjective measure. The point I was trying to convey is that Ad Equivalence can be used to help justify and quantify the value of a show. At a minimum you can begin to compare one show against another.
Cece makes a good point; qualitative measures should be considered as well. A really powerful article that drives web traffic can provide more benefit than the show itself. I guess that should be added as a #5 in my list of PR metrics.
However, the question still remains. Is that article, and the leads it generates, worth the cost of attending the show? I would argue that without consistent measurement, regardless of what criteria you specifically use, creates the potential to make a show become a waste of time and resources.
With regards to the ongoing trend towards more online trade show components, I certainly see the ability to increase revenue and reduce expenses. If an online component can provide broader reach, of say a keynote speech, it seems logical that more leads could be generated while reducing the overall cost.
I will admit that I have not had much experience with this “mixed” show approach and would be interested in any hard facts about the benefits anyone has seen.
As an online show can be a series of digitized sessions to a full blown “virtual tradeshow,” I think that we’ll see more research on this.
For example, we took a look at webcasts produced by B2B publishers on our platform last year. We found that a single webcast provided an average ROI of $35 per registrant and $63 per attendee. Attendees spent an average of 40 minutes viewing webcast content. This is based on an average of $20,000 to market and produce a webcast (may vary depending on costs).
Though we looked at the value of single events - not a series, I think that this does provide a snap shot to the potential value of a virtual trade show.
I feel the trade show results should be carefully tracked to determine if it pays for itself.
If it does, it’s a great way to get additional customers. A lot of thought though, has to go into capturing the max. number of customers during the trade show days.
Flint
[…] Are Trade Shows a Waste of Time and Resources? […]
If people in B2B are looking for a solution or there is a real need, their first reaction is to investigate the Internet.
This is more practical, more cost effective and more timely than going to a trade show.
So your leads are or have already been on your website.
The search engines have turned the Internet into a 24 x 7 worldwide trade show.
Instead of hoping people will find you on a trade show, keep the costs low and invest in a website visitor company revealing service, as for example LEADSExplorer. This service will generate leads every day, not just during trade shows.
Find your on your website
Tracking leads is a very good thing. I would argue that you should use marketing tactics like everything else in life: In moderation.
Although John’s post appears to be a shameless product plug, he does bring up a good point. You cannot ignore the cost benefits of modifying a more traditional marketing approach with the use of electronic marketing methods. The art of marketing is to recognize which tactic to use when. Without choosing appropriate measures, and then using those measures to make decisions it is much more difficult to optimize your results.
While other marketing channels might be better for specific industries, I think trade shows serve as another opportunity to generate a leads for your company. Some customers might prefer Googling, others prefer word-of-mouth, while others may rely on trade shows — so it’s always swell to be in front of hot prospects wherever they may be.
As with everything in business, I think it takes a lot of testing and experimentation — developed over years — to really know what works best and what doesn’t work too well to generate your company’s leads.
Nice post. The surveys still show that most B2B companies consider trade shows a very important part of their marketing mix. Unfortunately most totally blow their trade show opportunities and have little to show for it. I wrote a post last year on Trade Show Basics that is very supportive of your post.
Trade shows can provide an extraordinary ROI if properly planned and executed.
I Don’t Want to Do That Trade Show, No Matter What You Say…
I can’t remember the last event I sponsored (at any company) that offered me a positive return on our investment. The only one I can really think of was at a previous employer … the salesperson had created an opportunity in Salesforce.com after an e…
Hi,
I really enjoyed the article, it and all the comments are very helpful. I recently exibited at a very small trade show and just recently had some training. They showed us how to qualify your customers. I agreed most of the time, but there again, you have to look at each individual. Some people don’t have a need for what you have, but know someone who does. Even later on they may recall your product in a totally different conversation. So to dismiss someone who is just looking at the time could mean a missed sale later on, especially if they remember how you treated them. I’m trying to start small and slow to learn the correct way to deal with it.
I think everyone has relevant points. The truth is as the market place becomes more and more competitive with cheap goods from the Far East you have to exhibit at exhibitions. As always how much you’re prepared to spend and how creative you’re prepared to be can mean the world between getting 100 sales leads to 100,000 leads. What more and more companies are doing is using interactive kiosks so potential customers are not having to queue to speak to a representative. They can browse products and services via these kiosks and also book appointments with rep’s and leave there contact details. This way no potential sales leads are lost even if they don’t equate to sales.
trade shows are helpful. the exposure you get is worth it.
my experience as visitors on some trade show, it more exposed or give benefit for large trader. small trader just behind on them, even occasionaly it can promote small trader too.
If you’ve got a new product and want to create some buzz, trade shows can be a great platform to showcase your stuff. But your right, its all about the ROI. I’d probably explore some other advertising means before jumping for the registration form…
One can certainly pick up some good, bright, innovative ideas and perhaps meet potential business partners. Although same of the weary pitches can make you cringe all too easily..
I think that trade shows are often a huge throw away, but if you approach it the right way, it should be good. Been there couple of times myself and handle it in the right way, so its good for me. Kind Regards, Aislin
It’s really dependent upon the show and the person attending. I have been to shows that I found to be a complete waste, while friends found them very useful and vise versa.
I agree trade shows are worth the resources when you’ve got enough devotion to it and present yourself in a decent manner.
Have to admit that trade shows are becoming more and more a prestige thing, showing off against your competitors and reducing quality of the actual trade show.
In my experience, trade shows can be a huge waste of money, but they can also provide serious benefits, if approached strategically.
Spending tons of money on flashy booths and giveaways is for the giants…a smaller company may get huge benefits building relationships with potential partners (business development, as mentioned above), walking the floor and spreading the word about recent success stories, handing out business cards….This old-fashioned word of mouth marketing can pay off big dividends for small- and medium-sized firms at trade shows…without breaking the bank!
-Jeff
Very nice article about the ups and downs of trade shows. Still, carefully consider which shows to attend and which not.
very interesting article. Some good points made by most that have commented here.
A company in IT security on InfoSec gathered 120 leads (after cleaning out the known projects and the non suited “contacts”) on about 12,000 visitors.
The cost of the trade show was $100,000.
That’s about $833 / raw lead.
On their website they have about 400 visitors / day. About 60 companies / day can be identified using a web service. This low number is mainly due to the fact as they have many non-company visitors because of their stock market listing (retail investors).
Typically about 50% can be qualified as raw based upon the visiting data. Thus number of raw leads / day = 30.
Thus their website generates about the same number of raw leads every 4 days.
So why spending the money on a trade show?
Just for the word of mouth?
Just for the presence?